Skip to main content

Persephone's Pomegranate


Greek Goddess of Fertility. Ain't she a stunner?

I love pomegranates. I first heard of pomegranates in fourth grade when we learned Greek Mythology. The stories were full of pomegranates; it was practically a literary device for change. It was the pomegranate seed that changed the fate of poor Persephone, subjecting her to eternal life in the underworld.
I was reminded of the story of Persephone when I asked myself the question “are pomegranates fruits or berries?” I thought there was a difference, when really, fruit is more like the umbrella term and berries go under it.
According to E.N. Anderson’s “Everybody Eats” a fruit as seen by botanists is a ripened ovary produced by a flowering plant. Basically anything that grows on a stem and has seeds in it. This differs considerably to what us normal folks call fruit, but for all intents and purposes I am going to stick with the scientific term. (Apparently, eggplant is a fruit??)
So then we have different categories of fruits. There is aggregate fruit, which are fruits that came from one flower but that are made of many different ovaries (the sacs of liquid with seeds in them) like raspberries (raspberries!) and eggplant . Actual berries are defined as being “…a fleshy fruit in which the entire ovary wall ripens into an edible pericarp. The flowers of these plants have a superior ovary and one or more carpels within a thin covering and fleshy interiors.” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berry).
A pericap is just a fancy word for the edible outer skin of a fruit, like that of a squash. Wait…so then squash are berries? Apparently, every fruit that I considered a berry is not really a berry, and the fruits I separated into other categories were actually fruit.
I asked ten people in Lakeside dining to say whether the following fruits were berries or not: grapes, raspberries, plantains, pomegranates, strawberries, and blueberries. Here is what some of them said:
Grapes: one person said it was a berry…he was a bio major
Raspberries: everyone unanimously named this one a berry…too bad it actually isn’t.
Plantains: I had a few laughs. It hadn’t even occurred to anyone that this might be a berry but the tiny seeds nesting in the fleshy ovary suggests it is so.
Pomegranates: this one got a few head scratches. In general, everyone decided that a fruit had to have seeds, and that berries had to have many seeds. But the darn fruit didn’t even have the word berry in it.
Actually, I never considered it a berry either until I read E.N. Anderson. If a berry has to have an outer layer, with lots of ovaries then pomegranates definitely fit the bill. One website I checked out, http://waynesword.palomar.edu/termfr4.htm said that technically, pomegranates are “technically a leathery-skinned berry containing many seeds, each surrounded by a juicy, fleshy aril. But pomegranates have very little flesh and seems more like a vessel for fertility than a berry…
technically a leathery-skinned berry containing many seeds, each surrounded by a juicy, fleshy aril. But pomegranates have very little flesh and seem more like a vessel for fertility than a berry…
And I still have problems accepting that strawberries are just accessory fruits and rasberries are not berries at all. Could people in the future conceive of calling Persephone's fruit the pomegrante berry? I don't know...I just don't know...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mhmm, Delicious?

OUTLINE: of my project: Frish and Frosh Experiment Here is the outline of my experiment: Research: the vowels and sounds used in words that mean "big, small" etc. in *Sri Lankan, spanish, and french. 1. Following the procedure of the Frish vs. Frosh experiment, I will see if their conclusion holds true with international students. 2. I will have one or two native speakers of english as a control. I will then use one native speaker of sri lankan, spanish, and perhaps french. *note: the languages are tentative. 3. I will take the experiment one step further: I will give the participants two bowls of icecream: one named frish and the other frosh. I will tell them that they are the different icecreams they read about. 4. But there is a catch: actually they are eating the same ice cream. 5. Will what they have read about the icecreams affect how they feel the icecream tastes? Will one icecream taste better than the other? 6. Powerpoint presentation, perhaps. I found it quite diffi...

What a generic title...

So this blog is off and running! The title of this blog is only temporary, I know it seems a bit dull. So today was the first day of my introsem "The Linguistics of Food" and I made everyone jealous telling them of how fun this class already seems. We did a little experiment with a variety of chips: about half were from expensive brands and the other half were of cheaper brands. One thing I noticed as I walked back to my dorm was that on all the cheaper brands, the companies stressed either simplicity or wholesomeness, "The Original", or "Classic". Their appeal is one of nostalgia I think. Sometimes people don't want to try something new, they want food that's familiar and makes them think (perhaps) their childhood. I myself preferred a thick cut Ruffle chip to a Hawaiian chip. Sometimes less is more.